Green spaces benefit mental health

© 2022 Gwen Dewar, Ph.D., all rights reserved

Studies bear witness that green spaces can have a protective effect on our mental well-being. We're quicker to recover from stress, and less probable to experience depression. Kids grow upwardly with fewer psychiatric problems. Adults are less probable to commit suicide.

But non all greenish spaces are equal, and non everyone has equal access to rubber, loftier-quality nature zones. Here's what every parent — and every thinking person — needs to know.

---

Improving mental well-being commonly requires that we make a special effort, only here's a remedy that requires no work at all:

Experiments consistently show that we can better our immediate outlook — and bounce dorsum from stress — past merely gazing at scenes of nature.

Yous don't even have to get outside to unlock the result. Researchers have demonstrated that viewing photographs  — or looking at a window — is enough. Scenes of nature have a restorative effect. Urban scenes, and images of buildings, usually don't.

For case, when people view nature imagery, they experience fewer negative emotions, and they are more likely to report positive moods (Golding et al 2018; McMahan and Estes 2015) et al 2017).

And studies suggest that nature scenes are more probable to actuate our parasympathetic nervous system — the system that helps u.s.a. calm down and recover from stressful events (Park et al 2010; Berto 2014; van den Berg et al 2015; Hunter et al 2019).

If we reap these benefits from merely looking at nature, what happens when we spend time outdoors?

Whether it's a 15-minute visit to a green park, or a three-day immersive forest vacation, relaxing in green spaces can have firsthand, beneficial effects on your stress physiology.

For instance, 10 to 30 minutes of tranquility contemplation in nature tin can affect the residual of your twenty-four hours — lowering your levels of the stress hormone, cortisol (Hunter et al 2019).

And compared with spending time in human-built environments, time spent in light-green spaces is linked with more beneficial changes in blood pressure level and heart rate (Tsunetsugu et al 2010; Hansen et al 2017; Lanki et al 2017).

And nature walks appear to have a special touch on on our concrete and emotional well-being.

Exercise is proficient for mental health, only green exercise is even meliorate.

When people walk in natural (rather than urban) settings, they bear witness greater testify of stress relief. They experience lower cortisol levels. They besides experience temporary reductions in blood force per unit area and heart rate variability (Song et al 2016; Bratman et al 2012).

Green exercise is good for mental functioning, also. Every bit I explain in opens in a new windowsome other commodity, kids who play and walk in green spaces show immediate, curt-term improvements in their ability to focus and juggle facts. It also appears that walking in nature can help us placidity down a part of the brain that specializes in bad moods.

In an experiment by Gregory Bratman and his colleagues, researchers scanned the brains of 38 adult volunteers using MRI. In improver, the team asked report participants about their tendencies to ruminate, or brood.

Next, the researchers randomly assigned half the participants to take a 90-minute nature walk. The other one-half were assigned to take a ninety-minute walk along a busy, urban road.

Immediately on returning, each participant received another brain scan, and a follow-upward screening for rumination. And the results?

Different their urban-walking counterparts, people who'd gone on nature walks experienced reductions in their tendencies to ruminate. Subsequently walking, they were less likely to agree with statements like

"My attending is often focused on aspects of myself I wish I'd stop thinking well-nigh."

And nature walkers also experienced reduced activity in the subgenual prefrontal cortex (sgPFC), a encephalon area that becomes more than active when nosotros're deplorable, withdrawn, or reflecting on negative emotional experiences.

People who'd gone on urban walks exhibited no such changes in encephalon activity.

So there is a lot of experimental testify suggesting that dark-green spaces tin can improve our firsthand well-being. But what about long-term outcomes?

Does exposure to green space protect us from developing psychiatric disorders? Does information technology lower our take a chance of condign depressed, or developing stress-related psychosomatic symptoms? The risk of depression? Psychosomatic symptoms? suicide? Can we presume that green

To answer these questions definitively, nosotros'd want to exercise long-term experiments. But who would volunteer for something similar that? A written report where y'all might be randomly assigned to spend years of your life deprived of nature experiences?

It wouldn't be an ethical experiment, so nobody has tried it.

Instead, researchers have opted for the side by side best thing:

Discover out where people live, and see if the amount of local green space is correlated with mental health. Then use statistical methods to address causation.

For instance, if dark-green space is linked with better mental health outcomes, is this simply because people who live near greenish spaces tend to have more wealth?

Wealth tin can protect people from all sorts of atmospheric condition that worsen mental health, and a study of cities in Due north America confirms that affluent urban center-dwellers accept greater access to vegetation (Nesbitt et al 2019).

So when researchers evaluate correlations betwixt greenish space and mental health outcomes, they make statistical adjustments for the independent effect of socioeconomic factors.

And yes, they end up with testify that green spaces really practise take lasting bear upon. Hither's a pretty striking case — a study of nigh a million children growing up in Denmark.

Danish study: Kids face fewer psychiatric issues when they grow upwardly with lots of greenish infinite

By any account, information technology was a massive study. Kristine Engemann and her colleagues tracked the mental health outcomes of approximately 940 thousand individuals growing up in Denmark.

At the aforementioned time, the researchers pulled authorities records to institute where each of these children had lived at various points in their lives.

Then the researchers consulted satellite imagery to estimate the sheer amount of greenery in local environments. How much green space would a child take encountered at a given residence?

Using a measure out called NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), Engemann's team calculated the density of vegetation with 210 meters of each home.

Next, researchers posed the question: Did a child's cumulative exposure to greenish space — as measured past residential greenery — increase his or her risk of developing a psychiatric disorder?

To respond, the researchers compared kids at either end of the "green spectrum" — the ten percentage living with the highest vegetation density versus the 10 per centum living with the everyman vegetation density. And in that location were differences.

Greenish-deprived kids were more than likely to develop an assortment of psychiatric disorders.

Of course, some of the differences were due to overlap with other factors, similar socioeconomic condition. So the researchers made statistical adjustments, controlling for many things that might influence mental health outcomes, including

the age, income, pedagogy level, and psychiatric history of the children'south parents;

neighborhood socioeconomic factors, like the boilerplate income and education level of local residents; and

the degree of urbanization (whether kids lived in the metropolis, suburbs, or countryside).

After making these adjustments, some of the links disappeared. For case, the researchers institute that anorexia and bipolar disorder were no longer associated with green space deprivation.

But for other disorders, the gamble estimates didn't modify much, and the event of light-green space was substantial.

For example, afterwards making all adjustments, children who had grown upward around the lowest levels of vegetation had an approximately 28% college take chances of developing neurotic, stress-related, or psychosomatic disorders.

The kids were likewise at higher hazard for mood disorders (~xx%), obsessive-compulsive disorder (~twenty%), and substance abuse (~28%).

Okay, but this is just 1 study, and the researchers didn't control for everything. Don't we need more studies to figure out what'due south going on?

Aye, that'southward truthful. Only this isn't the only study of its kind. Using the satellite-imagery-and-NDVI approach, researchers around the globe take looked for links betwixt dark-green space and mental health. And they've found some.

Large-scale studies suggest that living near green spaces tin can reduce your hazard of depression.

Hither's a case in point: A study of almost 95 one thousand adults living the Britain.

Using NDVI, researchers estimated the density of vegetation within 500 meters of every written report participant'southward home. And the results? People living effectually high levels of green space were at lower risk for major depression (Sarkar et al 2018).

Moreover, this was true fifty-fifty after researchers controlled for

• economical factors (like employment condition, personal income, and neighborhood SES);
• social factors (like participation in social events, able-bodied clubs, or religious groups); and
• medical factors (like cardiovascular wellness, BMI, and smoking status).

The result was strongest for people living in impoverished neighborhoods, and for individuals living in places with high population density:

Green spaces — like urban parks — seemed particularly protective for folks coping with metropolis hassles and poverty (Sakar et al 2018).

A similar report of well-nigh 65 thousand people living in Due south Korea.

Afterward controlling for personal health factors and socioeconomic condition, researchers compared the quarter of the population living with the most vegetation to the quarter of the population living with the to the lowest degree vegetation.

The odds of developing depressive symptoms? They were approximately 23% lower for those lucky, "green" folks (Vocal et al 2019).

Studies conducted in the United States have also documented links betwixt residential green space and depression.

The biggest studies have targeted older adults (Banay et al 2019; Pun et al 2018; Brown et al 2018). For instance, a study of well-nigh 250,000 older Americans constitute that people were at lower risk for depression if they lived on blocks featuring high levels of vegetation (Brown et al 2018).

But a number of smaller studies have also reported substantial furnishings for prime-anile adults (Cohen-Cline et al 2015) and children (Madzia et al 2019; Bezold et al 2018). And a really interesting study followed the mental health outcomes of twins.

Light-green spaces are linked with lower depression risk even after researchers control for genetics and childhood environmental factors

The study included 4300 pairs of developed twins, roughly half of whom were monozygotic, or "identical."

The members of each twin pair had grown upwards together, so they shared many babyhood experiences. In addition, the monozygotic twins shared virtually all of their Deoxyribonucleic acid.

Only now, in adulthood, all the twins lived apart. Some individuals lived in areas with high levels of greenish infinite. Others lived in places that featured much less vegetation. Were these differences in residential light-green space linked with mental health?

It was a lucky, natural experiment, one that allowed researchers to control for the many genetic and early life environmental factors that can contribute to the development of mental health problems.

But of course there was more to consider. What nigh each individual'due south electric current socioeconomic status, and other factors that might differ betwixt adult twins?

So after screening each written report participant for mental health bug, researchers made statistical adjustments for the furnishings of current income, physical action levels, and neighborhood characteristics.

The results? Researchers found no links betwixt dark-green infinite access and anxiety issues. Only for depression, it was a dissimilar story.

If one twin lived in a greener surround, he or she was less probable to endure from symptoms of low. And this was true fifty-fifty for identical twins, who share near 100% of their DNA (Cohen-Cline et al 2015).

So NDVI correlational studies offer evidence that dark-green spaces accept a protective result against certain psychiatric problems, including stress-related disorders, substance abuse, and depression. What about the most extreme consequences of poor mental health?

Tin green spaces lower the risk of suicide?

Prove comes from a study conducted in kingdom of the netherlands.

Marco Helbich and his colleagues wanted to know if green spaces accept an touch on on the rate of suicide. So they calculated the density of vegetation in 398 unlike Dutch municipalities. Were local differences in greenery linked with local suicide rates?

Of course, the researchers knew that suicide is influenced past things that have zilch to practice with green infinite. Information technology'south crucial to control for these factors.

So Helbrich'south team made adjustments for local unemployment rates, divorce rates, and the availability of medical care. They controlled for municipal differences in economical impecuniousness and wealth.

They also controlled for whether a municipality was urban or rural, and whether it was inhabited by a loftier number of religious adherents.

In brusque, the researchers controlled for lots of things that might accept contributed to suicide, yet they however found a "light-green" outcome.

Independent of all the other factors, living almost green spaces reduced the run a risk of suicide.

Compared with municipalities with the everyman amount of vegetation, municipalities with moderate levels of vegetation had an viii% lower rate of suicide.

Municipalities with the highest amount of vegetation had a 12% lower rate of suicide.

So what'south going on? How are green spaces contributing to better mental health?

Starting time, it bears noting: Not every NDVI study has detected the same effects. Then nosotros demand more research to sort things out. But meanwhile, the blueprint of evidence is suggestive.

1. Green spaces may benefit us indirectly — by protecting us from pollution, and encouraging united states to exercise.

These factors don't explain everything — far from it. Only there's evidence that they play a role.

For instance, in a study of almost a thousand Spanish adults, Mireia Gascon and her colleagues found that residential green space reduced the risk of anxiety and depression. So the researchers delved deeper, and discovered that up to one third of the green outcome was connected with pollution.

Green spaces were linked with meliorate outcomes — at least in part — because they cleaned the air, and buffered residents from irritating traffic noise (Gascon et al 2018).

Similarly, there are connections with physical exercise, albeit small ones.

Researchers in People's republic of china found that daily exposure to green space improved mental well-being by encouraging people to practise more (Zhang et al 2018). But overall, this accounted for only a small portion of the light-green effect (Zhang et al 2018).

Besides, researchers in Australia institute that walking was partly responsible for links between green space access and mental well-being (Sugiyama et al 2014).

2. Dark-green spaces may also accept direct effects on mental health — providing united states with relaxing distractions and natural highs.

One theory is that the sights and sounds of nature offering our brains an opportunity to slack off. Nosotros no longer have to appoint in directed attention — the kind effortful, conscious attention we pay when we're in classroom or piece of work environment. This allows us recover from stress and mental fatigue (Kaplan 1995).

Some other proposal is that human beings take an innate desire to feel connected with nature. Viewing nature — being outdoors in a greenish space — triggers positive emotions. Nature experiences are intrinsically rewarding (Ulrich 1983; Wilson 1984; Ulrich 1983).

Then in that location is the question of awe — of being struck by the grandness, intricacy, or dazzler of nature.

Experiments confirm that dramatic nature imagery has a bigger emotional touch on. An image of the Grand Canyon is more uplifting than the image of more mundane nature scene (Joie and Bolderdijk 2015). When nature inspires awe, we're less probable to dwell on our personal problems.

3. The amount of green space most your home doesn't tell the whole story. People are also affected by the green spaces they encounter elsewhere — at work, at school, on commutes, and during recreational trips.

For example, take a contempo study of 85,000 adults and teenagers in California.

Researchers measured vegetation density within a 350 meter radius around residences, and constitute that lots of neighborhood greenery decreased the odds of "serious psychological distress." Simply this was truthful only for teenagers and adults over the age of 65. For people in the eye, there was no effect.

Why? We might question whether prime number-aged adults can benefit from green infinite, only other evidence — including experimental research — argues strongly confronting this. So what researchers suspect instead is that their measure out — the 350 meter zone — is to blame.

Prime number-aged adults accept more mobility than teenagers and elderly people. They venture exterior their dwelling house neighborhoods more ofttimes, and these trips may exposure them to green spaces elsewhere. As a result, we might wait prime number-aged adults to be less dependent on residential green space for their mental wellness.

So a meliorate mensurate of green space exposure would business relationship for all the greenery that people meet each day — non just at habitation, simply wherever they get.

And when researchers have taken this more fine-grained arroyo, they've confirmed links between green space exposure and mental well-being. This includes studies of prime number-aged adults, as well as teenagers and school children (Zhang et al; Mennis et al ; Amoly et al 2014).

four. What almost the least active amid the states? People who — for a variety of reasons — are less likely to venture beyond their ain individual gardens or yards? In these cases, it'due south probably non neighborhood vegetation that matters almost, but rather the view out the window.

In support of this thought, a study of older adults in Communist china found that residential green infinite density — measured by satellite photos and NDVI — was not linked with mental health. Instead, what made a deviation were the firsthand surroundings of the home:

Older people were less likely to be depressed if they were lucky enough to take a street view of vegetation (Helbich et al 2019).

5. The quality of green space matters.

NDVI studies tell u.s.a. simply most the density of vegetation. They don't tell us how local people feel about that vegetation.

Some spaces are inviting, serene nature spots, or beautiful urban parks with lots of civilities.

Other green spaces might be inaccessible (e.g., someone else's individual belongings) or stressful (east.g., hotspots for illegal dumping or crime).

When researchers have delved deeper — going beyond simple measure of residential NDVI — they've institute that information technology isn't the sheer quantity of residential green space that's important, but the quality.

For instance, children experience fewer psychological difficulties when they live near high quality dark-green spaces and urban parks (Francis et al 2012; Balseviciene et al 2014).

In a study of neighborhoods in Chicago, researchers found that neighborhood vegetation helped reduce people's stress levels. But at the same time, individuals living in very green areas often experiencedlower  levels of social support.

And so it wasn't the sheer amount of green infinite that helped people the most, but a specific kind of dark-green space — urban parks.  Presumably, that's because these parks provided the benefits of nature, while withal permitting people to experience connected with other members of their community (Fan et al 2011).

7. Privilege and social injustice loom large.

We've seen that nature spots and green spaces do good people regardless of their socioeconomic status. Only of course we don't all take equal opportunities to visit high quality green spaces — or enjoy them once we're there.

The advantages of wealth are obvious. But other forms of privilege — like white privilege — are crucial likewise.

For example, in the United States, African Americans have faced a long history of racism, harassment, and violence in public parks and dark-green spaces (Lee and Scott 2022 Lee and Scott 2017). How restorative tin can a nature visit exist, if you have to worry about being harassed, wrongfully arrested, or worse? Yous might live next to a beautiful public green space, yet lack true access.

8. And it's a sure bet that private differences thing.

Enquiry too suggests that the benefits depend on your emotional connection to nature. Do you experience part of the natural world? Practice you experience connected to other creatures and life forms? If then, you will probably perceive green spaces to be especially restorative (Berto et al 2018).

And certain populations might respond differently to the same natural features. For example, a study of more than 55,000 American kids establish that children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were more likely to develop anxiety if they lived near greenish spaces with lots of trees. For ordinarily-developing children, at that place was no such link (Larson et al 2018).

What should nosotros do?

Access to nature is a primal component of well-beingness. Information technology'south a right that we must fight for.

So in improver to getting our kids outdoors, we demand to ensure there are safe, welcoming places to play. We demand to design school grounds with greenish space, add green space to our urban environments, and modify a mentality that regards green infinite as a perk for the privileged few.

For more information on this topic, see my article about the benefits of outdoor learning. And read about the benefits of nature for our cities. In addition to improving public wellness, green spaces aid mitigate the effects of climate change. They assist reduce the heat island effect in cities, and release more moisture into the atmosphere.

This page from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency offers strategies and resources for calculation dark-green space to our urban environments.

Finally, put pressure on politicians and urban planners to add green space to your community, and protect our natural environment. Make sure your voice is heard. Vote for a improve hereafter.

---

References

Balseviciene B., Sinkariova L., Grazuleviciene R., Andrusaityte S., Uzdanaviciute I., Dedele A., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J. Impact of residential greenness on preschool children's emotional and behavioral problems. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Wellness. 2014;eleven:6757–6770.

Banay RF, James P, Hart JE, Kubzansky LD, Spiegelman D, Okereke OI, Spengler JD, Laden F. 2019.  Greenness and Depression Incidence among Older Women. Environ Wellness Perspect. 127(ii):27001

Berto R. 2014. The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: a literature review on restorativeness. Behav Sci (Basel). four(4):394-409.

Berto R, Barbiero G, Barbiero P, Senes G. 2018. An Individual'south Connection to Nature Can Affect Perceived Restorativeness of Natural Environments. Some Observations about Biophilia. Behav Sci (Basel). 8(3). pii: E34. doi: ten.3390/bs8030034.

Bezold CP, Banay RF, Coull BA, Hart JE, James P, Kubzansky LD, Missmer SA, Laden F. 2018. The relationship between surrounding greenness in babyhood and boyhood and depressive symptoms in boyhood and early on adulthood. Ann Epidemiol. 28(4):213-219.

Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Hahn KS, Daily GC, Gross JJ. 2015. Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112(28):8567-72.

Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Daily GC. 2012. The impacts of nature experience on human being cognitive function and mental wellness. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1249:118-36.

Brownish SC, Perrino T, Lombard J, Wang K, Toro M, Rundek T, Gutierrez CM, Dong C, Plater-Zyberk E, Nardi MI, Kardys J, Szapocznik J. Wellness Disparities in the Human relationship of Neighborhood Greenness to Mental Wellness Outcomes in 249,405 U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15(3).

Cartwright BDS, White MP, Clitherow TJ. 2018. Nearby Nature 'Buffers' the Effect of Low Social Connection on Developed Subjective Wellbeing over the Last 7 Days. Int J Environ Res Public Wellness. 15(half-dozen).

Cohen-Cline H, Turkheimer E, Duncan GE. 2015. Access to green space, physical action and mental health: a twin study. J Epidemiol Customs Wellness. 69(six):523-9.

Dzhambov AM, Markevych I, Hartig T, Tilov B, Arabadzhiev Z, Stoyanov D, Gatseva P, Dimitrova DD. 2018. Multiple pathways link urban light-green- and bluespace to mental health in young adults. Environ Res. 166:223-233.

Dzhambov AM, Markevych I, Tilov B, Arabadzhiev Z, Stoyanov D, Gatseva P, Dimitrova DD. 2018. Pathways linking residential dissonance and air pollution to mental ill-health in young adults. Environ Res. 166:458-465.

Fan Y, Das KV, Chen Q. 2011. Neighborhood green, social support, physical action, and stress: assessing the cumulative impact. Health Place. 2022 Nov;17(6):1202-eleven.

Francis J, Wood LJ, Knuiman M, Giles-Corti B. 2012. Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Soc Sci Med 74(ten):1570-7.

Gascon M, Sánchez-Benavides G, Dadvand P, Martínez D, Gramunt N, Gotsens Ten, Cirach Chiliad, Vert C, Molinuevo JL, Crous-Bou M, Nieuwenhuijsen M. 2018. Long-term exposure to residential greenish and blue spaces and feet and low in adults: A cross-exclusive written report. Environ Res. 162:231-239.

Gatersleben B, Andrews M. 2013. When walking in nature is not restorative-the role of prospect and refuge. Health Place. 20:91-101.

Generaal E, Hoogendijk EO, Stam M, Henke CE, Rutters F, Oosterman 1000, Huisman M, Kramer SE, Elders PJM, Timmermans EJ, Lakerveld J, Koomen E, Ten Have M, de Graaf R, Snijder MB, Stronks K, Willemsen M, Boomsma DI, Smit JH, Penninx BWJH. 2019a. Neighbourhood characteristics and prevalence and severity of low: pooled analysis of eight Dutch cohort studies. Br J Psychiatry.  6:ane-viii.

Generaal Eastward, Timmermans EJ, Dekkers JEC, Smit JH, Penninx BWJH. 2019b. Not urbanization level but socioeconomic, physical and social neighbourhood characteristics are associated with presence and severity of depressive and anxiety disorders. Psychol Med. 49(1):149-161.

Golding SE, Gatersleben B, Cropley M. 2018. An Experimental Exploration of the Effects of Exposure to Images of Nature on Rumination. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15(2)

Hansen MM, Jones R, Tocchini Thousand. 2017. Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bathing) and Nature Therapy: A State-of-the-Art Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 14(eight).

Hassan A, Tao J, Li One thousand, Jiang M, Aii L, Zhihui J, Zongfang L, Qibing C. 2018. Effects of Walking in Bamboo Woods and Metropolis Environments on Brainwave Activeness in Young Adults. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Feb eleven;2018: 9653857.

Helbich M, de Beurs D, Kwan MP, O'Connor RC, Groenewegen PP. 2018. Natural environments and suicide mortality in kingdom of the netherlands: a cross-exclusive, ecological study. Lancet Planet Health. 2(three):e134-e139.

Helbich M, Yao Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Liu P, Wang R. 2019. Using deep learning to examine street view green and blue spaces and their associations with geriatric low in Beijing, China. Environ Int. 126:107-117.

Houlden V, Weich S, Porto de Albuquerque J, Jarvis S, Rees K. 2018. The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review. PLoS Ane. xiii(9):e0203000.

Hunter MR, Gillespie BW, Chen SY. 2019. Urban Nature Experiences Reduce Stress in the Context of Daily Life Based on Salivary Biomarkers. Front Psychol. 10:722.

Joye Y and Bolderdijk JW. 2015. An exploratory written report into the effects of boggling nature on emotions, mood, and prosociality. Front Psychol. v:1577.

Kaplan S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 15: 169-182.

Kondo MC, Jacoby SF, S EC. 2018. Does spending time outdoors reduce stress? A review of real-time stress response to outdoor environments. Health Place. 51:136-150.

Lahart I, Darcy P, Gidlow C, Calogiuri G. 2019. The Furnishings of Greenish Exercise on Concrete and Mental Wellbeing: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. xvi(8).

Lanki T, Siponen T, Ojala A, Korpela M, Pennanen A, Tiittanen P, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T, Tyrväinen L. 2017. Acute effects of visits to urban dark-green environments on cardiovascular physiology in women: A field experiment. Environ Res. 159:176-185.

Larson LR, Barger B, Ogletree S, Torquati J, Rosenberg Southward, Gaither CJ, Bartz JM, Gardner A, Moody E, Schutte A. 2018.  Grayness space and greenish space proximity associated with higher anxiety in youth with autism. Health Place. 53:94-102.

Lee, KJJ and Scott D. 2016. Bourdieu and African Americans' park visitation: The case of Cedar Hill State Park in Texas. Leisure Sciences 38(5): 424–440.

Lee, KJJ and Scott D. 2017. Racism and African Americans' travel behavior: The utility of habitus and vignette technique. Periodical of Travel Research, 56 (3): 381-392.

Madzia J, Ryan P, Yolton Thousand, Percy Z, Newman N, LeMasters G, Brokamp C. 2019. Residential Greenspace Association with Childhood Behavioral Outcomes. J Pediatr. 207:233-240.

Markevych I, Tiesler CM, Fuertes E, Romanos One thousand, Dadvand P, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Berdel D, Koletzko Due south, Heinrich J. 2014. Access to urban greenish spaces and behavioural issues in children: Results from the GINIplus and LISAplus studies. Environ Int. 71:29-35.

McMahan EA. and Estes D. 2015. The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative touch on: a meta-analysis. J. Posit. Psychol. 10: 507–519

Mikkelsen K, Stojanovska L, Polenakovic M, Bosevski M, Apostolopoulos V. 2017. Exercise and mental health. Maturitas. 106:48-56.

Milligan C and Bingley A. 2007. Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Wellness Place. 13(four):799-811.

Nesbitt L, Meitner MJ, Girling C, Sheppard SRJ, Yuhao Lu Y. 2019. Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial assay of distributional green equity in 10 United states of america cities. Landscape and Urban Planning. 181: 51.

Ng HKS, Hong YL, Chow TS, Leung ANM. 2019. Nature Does Not Always Give You a Helping Hand: Comparing the Prosocial Effects of Nature at Different Resource and Security Levels. Pers Soc Psychol Balderdash. 45(4):616-633.

Okamoto-Mizuno K, Mizuno Thousand. 2012. Effects of thermal environs on sleep and circadian rhythm. J Physiol Anthropol. 31:14.

Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. 2010. The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): prove from field experiments in 24 forests across Nippon. Environ Health Prev Med. xv(1):18-26

Pun VC, Manjourides J, Suh HH. 2018. Association of neighborhood greenness with self-perceived stress, depression and anxiety symptoms in older U.S adults. Environ Health. 17(i):39.

Ruijsbroek A, Mohnen SM, Droomers Thou, Kruize H, Gidlow C, Gražulevičiene R, Andrusaityte Southward, Maas J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Triguero-Mas M, Masterson D, Ellis Northward, van Kempen Due east, Hardyns W, Stronks K, Groenewegen PP. 2017. Neighbourhood green space, social environment and mental health: an test in four European cities. Int J Public Health. 62(6):657-667

Sarkar C, Webster C, Gallacher J. 2018. Residential greenness and prevalence of major depressive disorders: a cross-sectional, observational, associational study of 94 879 adult Britain Biobank participants. Lancet Planet Health. 2(4):e162-e173.

Vocal C, Ikei H, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. 2019. Effects of Walking in a Woods on Young Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(2).

Song C, Ikei H, Miyazaki Y. 2016. Physiological Effects of Nature Therapy: A Review of the Inquiry in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Wellness. 13(8).

Song C, Ikei H, Park B, Lee J, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. 2018. Psychological Benefits of Walking through Wood Areas. Int J Environ Res Public Wellness. 15(12).

Song H, Lane KJ, Kim H, Kim H, Byun Chiliad, Le Thou, Choi Y, Park CR, Lee JT. 2019. Association betwixt Urban Greenness and Depressive Symptoms: Evaluation of Greenness Using Various Indicators. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(2). pii: E173.

Sreetheran M and van den Bosch CCK. 2014. A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban light-green spaces—A systematic review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 13:ane–18.

Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N. 2008. Associations of neighbourhood greenness with concrete and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explicate the relationships? J Epidemiol Community Health. 62(five):e9.

Tomita A, Vandormael AM, Cuadros D, Di Minin Due east, Heikinheimo V, Tanser F, Slotow R, Burns JK. 2017. Green environment and incident depression in South Africa: a geospatial analysis and mental health implications in a resource-limited setting. Lancet Planet Health. ane(iv):e152-e162.

Tsunetsugu Y, Park BJ, Miyazaki Y. 2010. Trends in research related to "Shinrin-yoku" (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing) in Japan. Environ Wellness Prev Med. 15(1):27-37.

Ulrich RS. 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Hum. Behav. Environ. Adv. Theor. Res. 6: 85–125.

Vanaken GJ and Danckaerts Thousand. 2018. Impact of Green Space Exposure on Children's and Adolescents' Mental Health: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15(12). pii: E2668.

van den Berg MM, Maas J, Muller R, Braun A, Kaandorp W, van Lien R, van Poppel MN, van Mechelen West, van den Berg AE. 2015. Autonomic Nervous Organization Responses to Viewing Greenish and Built Settings: Differentiating Between Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Activity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 12(12):15860-74.

Wilson EO. 1984. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Zhang Y, Kang J, Kang J. 2017. Effects of Soundscape on the Environmental Restoration in Urban Natural Environments. Racket Health.nineteen(87):65-72.

Zhang L, Zhou Due south, Kwan MP, Chen F, Lin R. 2018. Impacts of Private Daily Greenspace Exposure on Wellness Based on Individual Activity Space and Structural Equation Modeling. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15(x).

Zock JP, Verheij R, Helbich G, Volker B, Spreeuwenberg P, Strak M, Janssen NAH, Dijst M, Groenewegen P. 2018. The touch of social capital, land use, air pollution and noise on private morbidity in Dutch neighbourhoods. Environ Int. 121(Pt 1):453-460.

Title image of children roaming on the grass by opens in a new windowajari/flickr

satellite image of Kingdom of denmark by European Space Agency

image of toddler and father by opens in a new windowIan D. Keating / flickr

image of child hugging globe by opens in a new windowwoodleywonderworks / flickr

Content of "Green spaces benefit mental wellness" last modified 8/19

andersonourn1984.blogspot.com

Source: https://parentingscience.com/green-spaces-benefit-mental-health/

Share this post